Caustic soda antitrust. Caustic Soda Antitrust Litigation In re Caustic Soda Antitrust Litigation (“Caustic Soda”), Master File No. Jun 25, 2024 · June 25 (Reuters) - A U. Get free access to the complete judgment in In re Chlorine and Caustic Soda Antitrust Litigation on CaseMine. Her practice includes antitrust, unfair competition, and consumer protection litigation with a focus on complex class actions involving price-fixing, illegal tying, and unlawful monopolization. Apr 19, 2019 · The lawsuit uses the term “cartel” to describe the relationships between these companies and claims that the price fixing agreements have resulted in a 50 percent increase in the price of caustic soda. THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: ALL ACTIONS. Kan. J. 1:19-CV-00385 (2019 W. Budicak Inc. Nov 22, 2023 · Plaintiffs suing US chlor-alkali producers in a federal antitrust action want to settle with Westlake Corp. The parties drafted the settlement so as not to diminish the single damages to which the settlement class will be entitled if such are proven against the non-settling defendants. Mangan has extensive experience in all stages and aspects of Complex and Class Action Litigation, including the drafting of pleadings, discovery materials, and motion practice involving Securities, Antitrust, Consumer Protection, Pharmaceutical, Employment, Medical Device & Product Liability cases. The complaint was filed after more than a year of investigation of the U. v. Direct Contacts Plaintiffs’ arguments regarding Formosa’s purported direct contacts with the United States’ caustic soda market rely largely on their position that Formosa made sales of caustic soda to three customers in the United States, using Formosa USA as a mere nominal middleman. ); In Re: Local TV Advertising Drawing upon years of investigation and antitrust experience from early in his career, Michael advises companies and organizations in the US and Japan on complex commercial real estate and corporate transactions, including entity setup and governance issues, asset and equity transactions, and real estate transactions. Court Denies Motion for Class Certification In Caustic Soda Antitrust Litigation FTC’s Suit Targeting Pesticide Producers’ Loyalty Discounts Withstands Rule 12 Challenge Turbulence Ahead: Court Rejects JetBlue/Spirit Merger Court Grants Class Certification and Denies Apple’s Daubert Motions in Consumer Suit Against Apple Aug 1, 2019 · The lawsuit, originally filed as separate actions by various caustic soda buyers in March, alleges that since October 2015, chlor-alkali producers, which plaintiffs call a cartel, have conspired to restrict domestic supply and "fix, raise, maintain and stabilize" caustic soda prices via capacity reductions, planned maintenance shutdowns, conversations at industry events and price increase Aug 24, 2022 · IN RE: CAUSTIC SODA ANTITRUST LITIGATION. 148 at 5; see also In re Caustic Soda Antitrust Litig. subsidiary of Formosa Plastics Caustic soda is a commodity used in Plaintiffs’ respective businesses—they have been buying caustic soda long before Defendants began making their misrepresentations. Antitrust Litigation, 20-cv-02345 (N. Id. caustic soda industry. ). Pa. Aug 16, 2023 · The U. (2020–) In re Chlorine and Caustic Soda Antitrust Litigation, No. 3 (W. et al. ) and the indirect purchaser class plaintiffs in In re Concrete and Cement Additives Antitrust Litigation, No. The DPPs had previously moved for class certification, but the same judge refused to certify the class for failure to satisfy the predominance requirement. for $19 million and have Westlake provide caustic … In re Chlorine & Caustic Soda Antitrust Litigation — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information. subsidiary of Formosa Plastics (1301. S. In re Caustic Soda Antitrust Litigation (W. Zydus, Pharmaceuticals (USA), Inc. SELECTED CASES Antitrust In Re: Caustic Soda Antitrust Litigation Wexler Boley & Elgersma LLP (2022–) Jul 29, 2019 · All persons and entities who indirectly purchased from a distributor, and did not resell, Caustic Soda in the United States for non-residential use manufactured by one or more of the Defendants or their co-conspirators (or any of Defendants’ or their co-conspirators’ parents, predecessors, subsidiaries or affiliates) at any time between October 1, 2015, and the present. 1:19-cv-00385-EAW-MJR Dear Judge Wolford: As the Court knows, the undersigned serves as liaison Docket for IN RE: Chlorine and Caustic Soda Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. Olin Corp, 1:19-cv-00385, an antitrust lawsuit alleging collusion over the price for caustic soda—a chemical used in various industries from pharmaceuticals to detergents. ) Additionally, Ms. C. Jan 27, 2025 · Id. Ms. (D. Excluded from the Class are Defendants, their co-conspirators, parents, predecessors The IPPs incorporated the factual allegations previously raised by direct purchasers (DPPs) of caustic soda. The District Court, Bechtle, J. Nast, is a civil litigator with extensive and diverse experience in pharmaceutical and antitrust litigation. 2006) (theft of trade secrets in model train industry) Mitchell Partners v. 294-1 at 13). Lansing Trade Group, LLC et al. Jan 11, 2024 · On December 28, the Western District of New York denied class certification in Miami Products & Chemical Co. Keating Federal Building 100 State Street Rochester, New York 14614 Re: In re Caustic Soda Antitrust Litigation Lead Case No. The Court denied plaintiffs' motion for class certification. Aug 15, 2023 · Caustic soda, sold as a solid or liquid, is used in soaps and detergents, food processing, textiles, pharmaceuticals and other industries, the plaintiffs said in their lawsuit. Aug 1, 2019 · The lawsuit, originally filed as separate actions by various caustic soda buyers in March, alleges that since October 2015, chlor-alkali producers, which plaintiffs call a cartel, have conspired to restrict domestic supply and "fix, raise, maintain and stabilize" caustic soda prices via capacity reductions, planned maintenance shutdowns, conversations at industry events and price increase Aug 1, 2019 · The lawsuit, originally filed as separate actions by various caustic soda buyers in March, alleges that since October 2015, chlor-alkali producers, which plaintiffs call a cartel, have conspired to restrict domestic supply and "fix, raise, maintain and stabilize" caustic soda prices via capacity reductions, planned maintenance shutdowns, conversations at industry events and price increase In re: Caustic Soda Antitrust Litigation Wexler Boley & Elgersma LLP, Grant & Eisenhofer P. Caustic soda is used by a Jan 11, 2024 · At the outset, plaintiffs’ proposed class definition excluded purchasers who bought caustic soda under long-term contracts with either fixed prices or prices based upon production input costs. United States District Court, W. Julia C. Excluded from the In re: Caustic Soda Antitrust Litigation Wexler Boley & Elgersma LLP, Grant & Eisenhofer P. Plaintiff Amrex Chemical Co. If your business purchased caustic soda (lye) sometime since October 2015 In re: Caustic Soda Antitrust Litigation Wexler Boley & Elgersma LLP, Grant & Eisenhofer P. Over government She is currently part of the co-lead team for the direct purchaser class plaintiffs in In re Caustic Soda Antitrust Litigation, 19-cv-00385 (W. Plaintiffs and the Class have conferred a direct economic benefit upon Defendants, in that the revenues received by Defendants from selling Caustic Soda at wrongfully inflated prices are directly related to, and flow from the overcharges paid by Plaintiffs and the Class for the purchase of Caustic Soda. A. TW) and Jan 5, 2024 · Plaintiffs’ proposed class excluded purchases of caustic soda during the class period pursuant to contracts because the alleged anticompetitive price increases would not have impacted the contract prices. For example, in Miami Products & Chemical Co. 19-cv-00385 (W. Kaplan Fox and its’ co-counsel represent several large direct purchasers of sodium hydroxide, (commonly known as caustic soda) in civil antitrust litigation against several leading chemical manufacturers who have conspired to artificially inflate the price of sodium hydroxide dating back to at least October 1, 2015. Olin Corporation, direct purchasers of caustic soda (also known as lye) sued caustic soda producers, alleging that producers engaged in a conspiracy to fix caustic soda prices in the United States. Varano has extensive experience as counsel in complex commercial litigation in state and federal courts throughout the nation, with a particular concentration and emphasis in class action litigation under federal antitrust laws. He has shepherded cases from conception to completion, including class certification The lawsuit, originally filed as separate actions by various caustic soda buyers in March, alleges that since October 2015, chlor-alkali producers, which plaintiffs call a cartel, have conspired to restrict domestic supply and "fix, raise, maintain and stabilize" caustic soda prices via capacity reductions, planned maintenance shutdowns, conversations at industry events and price increase In re: Caustic Soda Antitrust Litigation Wexler Boley & Elgersma LLP, Grant & Eisenhofer P. 5 million to settle an antitrust lawsuit in which the company was accused of curbing the supply of caustic soda to CERA LLP RECENT ANTITRUST FILING CERA LLP announces that it has filed a class action complaint on behalf of its client and a class of similarly situated direct purchasers against the principal suppliers of caustic soda in the United States. 86-5428 (E. (2020–) All persons and entities who purchased Caustic Soda in the United States directly from one or more of the Defendants or their co-conspirators (or from any of Defendants’ or their co-conspirators’ parents, predecessors, subsidiaries or affiliates) at any time between October 1, 2015, and the present. (2020–) In re: Caustic Soda Antitrust Litigation Wexler Boley & Elgersma LLP, Grant & Eisenhofer P. This kind of price-fixing scheme violates a number of federal antitrust laws. Charles E. Definition of “Caustic Soda”: Caustic Soda refers to liquid forms of caustic soda in membrane or diaphragm grades purchased in the United States, for example, “MEM-50” or “Sodium Hydroxide 50% DIA. Oct 10, 2024 · In re Caustic Soda Antitrust. Plaintiffs in Caustic Soda allege that some of the largest chemical manufacturers in the state conspired to inflate the price of ca In re Caustic Soda Antitrust. Mar 29, 2019 · Sodium hydroxide, also known as caustic soda, is one of the most ubiquitous chemicals in commerce, used as a base or neutralizing agent in everything from laboratory research to large-volume Apr 4, 2019 · The caustic soda price-fixing class action claims these actions violate antitrust laws that are aimed at curbing behavior deemed as “anticompetitive. Caustic Soda Antitrust Litigation: Mr. subsidiary of Taiwan-based Formosa Plastics has agreed to pay US$7. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE CAUSTIC SODA ANTITRUST LITIGATION Lead Case No. 19-cv-2449 (D. Buyers moved for class action certification. Defending a large chemical manufacturer in class action cases brought by direct and indirect purchasers claiming it participated in a price-fixing and supply reduction conspiracy in the caustic soda market. caustic soda producers conspired to restrict supply and fix prices. In re Caustic Soda Antitrust. (2020–) In re Caustic Soda Antitrust Litigation (W. Ca. ) From 1977 to 1980, Steve served as an Assistant Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and was the first chief of its Antitrust Division. Motion granted. The proposed classes are defined as follows: State Antitrust Class: All persons and entities who indirectly purchased from a distributor, and did not resell, liquid forms of membrane or diaphragm grade caustic soda in Arizona, California, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nebraska See Dkt. Joe has been designated by federal and state courts and by his co-counsel throughout the country as lead counsel in class action and other multi-party litigation. Wolford United States District Judge Kenneth B. ) (national price fixing class action case involving manufacturers of chlorine) Mike’s Train House v. and other defendants of fixing the price of caustic soda, also known as sodium hydroxide or lye. Varano works or has worked on numerous matters including: In Re: Caustic Soda Antitrust Litig. Kaplan Fox and its’ co-counsel represent several large direct purchasers of sodium hydroxide, (commonly known as caustic soda) in civil antitrust litigation against several leading chemical manufacturers who have conspired to artificially inflate the price of sodium hydroxide dating back to at least October 1, 2015…. Kohn has, since 1982, litigated major civil cases in a variety of fields, including antitrust, securities, product liability, environmental, lender liability, employment, and civil rights. The firm's client, Miami Products & Chemical Co. Defended Olin Corporation in several nationwide class actions alleging that virtually all U. has asked the U. Defeated a class certification motion proposed by a group of six plaintiff companies who allege Susman Godfrey client, Westlake Chemical, and other defendant chemical companies colluded to inflate the price of products containing caustic soda. ” Amrex asserts that the price-fixing scheme began in 2015. Jan 5, 2024 · Plaintiffs alleged that they purchased caustic soda, a chemical co-produced with chlorine that is used in a variety of industries, from Defendants between October 1, 2015 and December 31, 2018. Excluded from the Kaplan Fox and its’ co-counsel represent several large direct purchasers of sodium hydroxide, (commonly known as caustic soda) in civil antitrust litigation against several leading chemical manufacturers who have conspired to artificially inflate the price of sodium hydroxide dating back to at least October 1, 2015…. Takeda Pharma USA, Inc. Ligansky serves on the 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE: CAUSTIC SODA ANTITRUST LITIGATION Lead Case No. (2020–) May 19, 2019 · Caustic Soda Overview Has your business noticed an increase in the price of caustic soda? Producers of this common industrial chemical have been accused of engaging in a price-fixing scheme that has sharply raised costs over the last few years. Lionel, 472 F. Caustic Soda Antitrust Litigation Direct & Indirect Purchaser COMPANY INFORMATION Date A New York federal judge has tossed out some state law claims from indirect buyers in a suit accusing lye makers of working together to inflate the price of their caustic soda product. Maider represents a putative end-user class of indirect purchasers alleging that the nation's largest chemical manufacturers conspired to inflate the price of caustic soda, a chemical commodity used in NastLaw founder, Dianne M. What is Caustic Soda? Caustic soda is a chemical produced as a by-product of chlorine production and is also known as sodium hydroxide or lye. Dec. Y. Aug 14, 2023 · We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. New York. Nov 8, 2023 · Class Action, Long-term Care Insurance Two Expert Reports, One Deposition In re: Caustic Soda Antitrust Litigation Wexler Boley & Elgersma LLP, Grant & Eisenhofer P. The decision illustrates the requirements associated with motions for class certifications and is a practical reminder about the stringent requirements to obtain them. Direct purchasers of caustic soda, the plaintiffs in a four-year-long Joseph C. Antitrust law in the USA prohibits unfair business practices and behavior. (2020–) Zoki joined Wexler Boley & Elgersma in February 2021 to work on complex class‑action litigation in the areas of antitrust, consumer protection, and healthcare Grabar Law Office has filed a putative class action alleging that the major manufacturers of Caustic Soda (also known as Sodium Hydroxide) agreed among themselves to limit capacity and coordinate price increases in order to artificially inflate prices of Caustic Soda in violation of federal antitrust laws. 255. , filed the first direct purchaser price-fixing class action in March 2019. , Case No. 24-md-3097 (S. Ligansky is also a part of the Kaplan Fox team representing the direct purchaser class plaintiffs in In re Caustic Soda Antitrust Litigation, No. ) (Robinson, J. (2020–) 1) This document summarizes a court case reviewing a decision by the Secretary of Commerce to issue a certificate of review providing antitrust immunity to a joint venture of chlorine and caustic soda producers for their export activities. Sep 23, 2024 · Learn about a recent decision in an antitrust case alleging price fixing for caustic soda and what it teaches us about the class certification process. Macartney opined, among other things, that: (1) common evidence demonstrates that the structure of the caustic soda industry is conducive to anticompetitive behavior; (2) common evidence and methods demonstrate that Defendants engaged in collusive behavior that artificially increased the price of caustic soda; and (3) there In re Caustic Soda Antitrust. judge has refused to approve class action settlements worth $38. Aug 22, 2024 · The US District Court for the Western District of New York has denied the plaintiffs’ motion for class certification in an antitrust case alleging price fixing for caustic soda. , No. D. Direct Dial: (716) 854-4073 rlg@cgbuffalo. Jul 29, 2019 · All persons and entities who indirectly purchased from a distributor, and did not resell, Caustic Soda in the United States for non-residential use manufactured by one or more of the Defendants or their co-conspirators (or any of Defendants’ or their co-conspirators’ parents, predecessors, subsidiaries or affiliates) at any time between October 1, 2015, and the present. 2019), in which the court recently upheld plaintifs’ price-fixing claims against five major manufacturers of caustic soda. 8, 2021) (“Because the subpoenaed [non-parties] here are solvent businesses and not individuals, the Court finds this scenario distinguishable from cases . Instead, the Complaint mixes Defendants’ rational business conduct, conclusory assertions of agreement, and Plaintiffs’ unsupported, speculative imaginings to declare conspiracy. N. In re: Caustic Soda Antitrust Litigation Wexler Boley & Elgersma LLP, Grant & Eisenhofer P. Walmart Employment Class Actions. The IPPs’ failure to present common evidence of classwide injury under Rule 23 (b) (3) proved dispositive. Dec 28, 2023 · The US District Court for the Western District of New York has denied the plaintiffs’ motion for class certification in an antitrust case alleging price fixing for caustic soda. 703 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information. Get free access to the complete judgment in In re Caustic Soda Antitrust Iitigation on CaseMine. Aug 15, 2023 · Direct purchasers of the chemical sodium hydroxide- commonly known as caustic soda- have been dealt a landmark victory in their antitrust lawsuit against the U. com May 25, 2023 Via CM/ECF Honorable Elizabeth A. Learn more about antitrust lawsuits from NastLaw's experienced antitrust lawyers. Fatima Brizuela is a partner at Scott+Scott’s San Diego office. 1:19-cv-385(EAW/MJR), 2021 WL 9817565, at *2 n. , held that buyers satisfied requirements for class action on claim that producers conspired to fix, raise, maintain, and stabilize prices of chlorine and caustic soda throughout United States. (2020–) Class Action, Caustic Soda Two Expert Declarations, Two Depositions In re: Caustic Soda Antitrust Litigation Wexler Boley & Elgersma LLP, Grant & Eisenhofer P. Takeaways: The district court’s second denial of class certification for caustic soda purchasers underscores the complexity of antitrust claims in markets with complex pricing structures. Case background The direct purchaser plaintiffs Mar 25, 2019 · A host of chemicals manufacturers conspired to artificially inflate the price of sodium hydroxide, according to a new federal lawsuit. Dec 16, 2024 · Id. Jan 3, 2024 · The United States District Court for the Western District of New York has just issued its opinion denying class certification to a putative class of direct purchaser plaintiffs (“DPPs”). District Court for the Western District of New York to certify the case as a class action. , 1:19-cv-00385 (W. Caustic Soda is sold in grades to customers in a variety of industries, including but not limited to: chemical production; paper, pulp and cellulose; soaps and detergents; aluminum; food The economics of caustic soda and chlorine under the Antitrust Authority eye I have been requested to write an opinion on whether a manufacturer of chlorine hypochlorite is tampering free competition by having two different prices for two different types of clients: a big buyer (about 2000 tons per month) and small clients (about 15 tons per In re: Caustic Soda Antitrust Litigation Wexler Boley & Elgersma LLP, Grant & Eisenhofer P. August 24, 2022. ) tion (“Caustic Soda”), Master File No. 5 million that would resolve allegations that a U. The Court issued a 51-page ruling in denying Plaintiffs’ motion. (2020–) In re Chlorine and Caustic Soda Antitrust Litigation, Civil 86-5428 (E. A group of chemical companies including Occidental Chemical and Olin lost motions to dismiss litigation accusing them of fixing prices of sodium hydroxide, a/k/a caustic soda. Mar 30, 2020 · Caustic soda, according to the case, is a common substance used in a variety of industries, including paper, chemical production, soaps, aluminum, food processing, water treatment, textiles . (See Dkt. 5 million to settle an antitrust lawsuit in which the company was accused of curbing the supply of caustic soda to inflate prices. Jun 25, 2024 · A federal judge has denied deals worth $38. : 1:19-cv-00385-EAW-MJR THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: ALL DIRECT PURCHASER ACTIONS PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION, AND APPOINTMENT OF CLASS REPRESENTATIVES AND CLASS COUNSEL PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Direct 1. 5 million in a case accusing Formosa Plastics Corp. ”)). in which courts more strictly limited discovery C OLUCCI & G ALLAHER, P. Mar 9, 2024 · Court Denies Motion for Class Certification In Caustic Soda Antitrust Litigation Antitrust and Unfair Competition Law Section of the California Lawyers Association Read more. (2020–) Aug 16, 2023 · The U. 6 Defendants were estimated to collectively control 90 percent of the domestic supply of caustic Aug 14, 2020 · She currently serves as part of the co-lead teams in In re Caustic Soda Antitrust Litigation (W. The IPPs then initiated new litigation and sought to certify two classes: (1) a State Antitrust Class covering indirect IPPs’ expert Dr. Opinion Buyers brought antitrust action against major producers of chlorine and caustic soda for fixing prices. Pa. Class Action, Long-term Care Insurance Two Expert Reports, One Deposition In re: Caustic Soda Antitrust Litigation Wexler Boley & Elgersma LLP, Grant & Eisenhofer P. 2) The plaintiffs, who are traders of caustic soda and chlorine, sued in district court seeking to set aside the Secretary's determination. The DPPs alleged that certain producers of caustic soda (collectively, “Defendants”) had violated Section 1 of the Sherman Act by entering into a conspiracy to artificially reduce or eliminate Mar 27, 2019 · A proposed class action lawsuit filed in New York claims the leading manufacturers of sodium hydroxide, commonly known as caustic soda or lye, have artificially inflated the prices of the substance since October 2015. . , Westlake Chemical Corp. ), and is a member of the steering committee representing the indirect reseller plaintiff class in In re Juul Labs, Inc. Mar 26, 2019 · The country’s top makers of sodium hydroxide, a chemical used in industrial manufacturing, have been hit with two more proposed class actions alleging a price-fixing conspiracy. 3d 398 (6th Cir. 1:19-cv-00385- EAW-MJR THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: All Actions caustic soda prices—recent industry consolidation, “soar[ing]” export prices, and caustic soda’s production as a co-product of chlorine. bxaty nkoi pmljqu uwqop dbyew rtxjuefg oymu ejyeuhj wuxmpbj ujws
|